Cost calculators for AI builders

What did your Claude
plan give you this month?

Import your Claude Code usage, compare its API-equivalent value with your plan price, and make a receipt you can share. Your report stays in your browser. Check the example first.

Example only · made-up usage

One month of recorded Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 usage, priced with 5-minute cache writes. This compares API value with monthly list prices; it does not predict plan limits.

$106.10

API-equivalent value

Try the working example →

Selected model pricing

All models →
  • Claude Opus 5.5 $4.00 / $20.00
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 $2.00 / $10.00
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.10 / $0.50

Input then output, USD per 1M tokens. Cache, batch, and long-context tiers are on the individual model pages. All models verified. Last refresh 2026-10-27.

Featured · Claude Code

Was your Claude Code plan worth it?

Open the verdict tool

Paste one month of real usage (ccusage output) and get the API-equivalent bill, your value multiple, and a verdict on Pro vs Max vs API. Plus a receipt card you can drop in the group chat. Parsed in your browser, never uploaded.

Quick token counter

Full counter →
Tokens
0
Characters
0
Words
0
Cost / 1k calls
$0.00

Cost estimate assumes 1,000 calls of this prompt as input plus 200 output tokens per call. Tokenizer for non-OpenAI models is approximated with cl100k_base or char/4, typically within 5 to 15% of true count. Claude models from Opus 4.7 onward (including Opus 5, Sonnet 5, and the Fable family) use a newer tokenizer that produces roughly 30% more tokens for the same text, so counts for those models may run low. Pricing data last verified 2026-10-27.

What's different here

Most calculators stop at headline pricing. We model what actually drives the bill.

  1. 01

    Caching ROI, not hand-waving

    Anthropic's prompt cache cuts repeat input by up to 90%. Most calculators stop at the headline number. We model cache write cost against read cost against hit rate, and tell you the break-even point where caching actually pays.

    Caching ROI
  2. 02

    Sync vs batch vs flex, decided

    Batch is 50% off, but only fits async workloads. We frame this as a workload decision, not just a discount, so you know when to use batch and when not to.

    Batch decision tool
  3. 03

    Agent loops, real cost

    Multi-turn agents with tool calls, reasoning tokens, retries, and context growth cost very differently from single API calls. Project realistic monthly spend with workload templates for chatbots, coding agents, RAG, and batch classifiers.

    Agent simulator
  4. 04

    Pricing with a verification date

    Every model carries a last-verified stamp and an official-vs-inferred confidence flag. We publish a changelog. There's a "report incorrect price" link in the footer.

    Changelog

More narrow calculators (Cursor, Aider, Cline, agent-API workflows) ship only when the Claude Code verdict tool proves people want them. One tool, one decision, no marketing fluff.

Ready when you are

Stop guessing. Model the bill.

Start with the Claude Code verdict tool if you're deciding between Pro, Max, or API. Or jump into the agent simulator for any other LLM workflow.